The purpose of this study was to evaluated the functional results of vascularized and nonvascularized nerve graft by clinical, electrophysiological, histomorphometric and walking track assessment. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were used and divided
into
three groups. In the control group(n=10), closure of the wound was done immediately after sham dissection only. In both the nerve graft groups, the sciatic nerve was isolated from surrounding tissue except the vascular pedicle, and then resected
with
microsurgical scissors to create a 1cm-length defect. The segment was used as a graft material and repaired with 10-0 sutures under operating microscope in both nerve graft groups. After that the vascular pedicle was cut in the nonvascularized
nerve
graft group (n=10) and preserved in the vascularized nerve graft group(n=10). Footprints were obtained and analysed before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 weeks after operation. Electrophysiologic and histomorphometric assessment were done at the 10th
postoperative week.
@ES The results obtained were as follows;
@EN 1. Gross findings
The swelling, rubor, toe clawing, and foot dragging of the hindfoot on the operation side were observed after the repair in both the nerve graft groups. These situations were improved somewhat, but not totally, with increasing time in the
vascularized
nerve graft group than in the nonvascularized.
2. Gait analysis
The average sciatic function index(SFI) before the repair was -7.43, At 1 week after the surgery, the SFI of the control group was not statiatically different to that of preoperative index, and improved with time. But, at 10 weeks after the
surgery,
although some improvement of SFI existed with time in the vascularized nerve graft group, it was quite lower than that of the control group (P<0.001). In the nonvascularized nerve graft group, at 10 weeks after the surgery, the SFI was almost not
improved and much lower than that of the both of the control and vascularized nerve graft group(P<0.01).
3. Electrophysiologic assessment.
At 10 weeks after the surgery, there is no statistical difference of nerve conduction velocity and peak amplitude between the control and vascularized nerve graft groups. But they were larger in the control and vascularized nerve graft groups
than
in
the nonvascularized(P<0.05).
4. Histomorphometric assessment.
At 10 weeks after the surgery, the mean diameter of myelinated nerve fiber was larger in the control group than both the graft groups, and in the vascularized nerve graft group than the nonvascularized(P<0.05). And the area of myelinated nerve
fiber was
larger in the control and vascularized nerve graft group than nonvascularized(P<0.05).
These results indicated that the vascularized nerve graft was superior to the nonvascularized, the regard to nerve regeneration after the repair of nerve defect.
|